Christopher Knight has written his idea of a
wish list for Christmas. As if the article wasn't bad enough, it is accompanied by a literal checklist!
Now, I know it is the job of the art critic/writer to put themselves out there and take a stand which will stir up the pot; but this is just ridiculous and problematic rolled into one. Not only are we fed the "45 under 45" must haves, but Christopher Knight misleads the readers down a path into non-critical thinking. As readers, we are meant to believe that artists in art schools are wrongly questioned as to why they are painting.
What a romantic ideal Knight has of painting, when he describes it as "...just one person in a room, with a flat plane and some colors, trying to juice the corpse and make it dance."
There is hope for Knight! In the last paragraph, he writes, "Painting isn't dead -- or, more precisely, it always has been and always will be. The perpetual trick is to give a painting life." This hints at the idea that it is the artists job to give painting a reason to exist, which in the end should be applied to all art, not just painting; but it is painting that gets dragged down this path.